|
|
|
"We are diverse and the diversity is the dynamic! Exhilirated at the sense of our role as visitors in the universe. We who visit are the sons of the morning, the daughters of the day! We have seen our souls at noon, on the busy park in the center of town, and danced to rhythms of our own work! As always, there is the futility, certainty of disaster, but also of salvation! We glitter in the interactive, more and better than ever before and, accepting our part in the diversity of who we are, we stopped the lament! We found our lights! and we share wholeheartedly, our individual contributions, scrambling to use the new lights well; sons of the morning, daughters of the day - making a day of light once again!" Ellen Smith Fagan Copyright 2003 Ellen Smith Fagan |
|
Excerpted from NYtimes: In 9/11 Design, Rules Are Set to Be Broken By EDWARD WYATT Officials overseeing the competition to design a memorial to the victims of the terrorist attack of Sept. 11, 2001, and the 1993 bombing of the World Trade Center promised yesterday that all entries would be considered, even those that stray from the official guidelines for the placement and content of the memorial. At a news conference announcing the start of the design competition, some of the jurors who will select the winner encouraged entrants to challenge those boundaries. Maya Lin, the designer of the Vietnam Veterans Memorial and one of 13 jurors in the World Trade Center competition, challenged entrants to come up with "a new way of defining what a memorial can be." Another juror, James E. Young, a scholar with expertise in memorials and remembrance, said of entrants: "Anything they might have in mind, any response, will be considered here. We want architects and artists , anybody who submits, to feel they can go where their imaginations, where their mourning needs to take them in order to articulate some relationship to this terrible loss." In essentially voiding some of the guidelines that they had just released, the officials said they were trying to signal that neither the memorial competition nor the jury would be influenced by the kind of political pressure that shaped the selection of Daniel Libeskind's design for the trade center site. Earlier this year, a committee of directors of the Lower Manhattan Development Corporation recommended a design by a group called Think, one of two finalists in the site competition. Think proposed two latticework towers as a symbolic replacement for the destroyed twin towers. But Gov. George E. Pataki and Mayor Michael R. Bloomberg, who favored Mr. Libeskind's design, overruled the directors. Kevin Rampe, the interim president of the development corporation, which is overseeing the competition, said yesterday that officials were open to the possibility that "it may take going outside of those guidelines" for competitors to express their creativity. As an example of breaking boundaries, Dr. Young pointed to Ms. Lin, who he said "broke some of the rules on the way to her spectacular Vietnam Veterans Memorial," and to Mr. Libeskind, the architect of the site design, who "had to break all kinds of rules to make his design." Mr. Libeskind will be a technical consultant to the jury, but he will not be involved in the selection of the winning design, Mr. Rampe said. Competitors have until May 29 to register and until June 30 to submit their designs. The field will be narrowed to about five finalists, and the winner will be selected in the fall, officials said. The officials said that all entries must conform to the display guidelines published by the development corporation. Those can be seen at www.wtcsitememorial.org on the Internet or obtained by faxing a request, with the entrant's mailing address, to 800-717-5699. A $25 entry fee is required to register for the competition. Officials said the money would go toward building the memorial. The guidelines say that competitors may create a memorial "of any type, shape, height or concept," that includes five physical elements: Officials expect all those elements to be placed within the 4.5 acres bounded by the walls built to hold back the waters of the Hudson River. The walls are at the center of Mr. Libeskind's design. But the guidelines also note that areas outside the sunken area can be included in a design and "may be considered by the jury if, in collaboration with the Lower Manhattan Development Corporation, they are deemed feasible and consistent with site plan objectives." The jury, made up largely of artists, museum curators and design professionals, also includes a downtown resident and the spouse of a victim of the 9/11 attack. Paula Grant Berry, a juror whose husband, David, was killed at the trade center, said the memorial would "be for all the people of New York and really for the world, but especially for all the families." Ms. Berry added: "I am determined that a memorial be built where we will be proud to bring our children. We must never lose sight of why we are doing this and who we are doing it for. Magnificent people died, and we must be magnificent in how we honor them." Asked what advice she had for those entering the competition, Ms. Lin said: "You enter a competition not necessarily to win but to say what you truly believe needs to be done there. I think you should think about what could a memorial be here. Is it a place? Is it an object? Does it frame the site? I hope we get submissions from people who just believe that their solution is right." |
A Remedy: Escape pods for Tall Buildings and AirplanesAeronautical Engineers' idea, tabled for tech reasons in the fifties, are probably possible now. Get involved in its support if you can! The attacks of September 11, 2001 changed a lot of lives. The worst of it is that they did not need to happen! If a prosecuteable case against Osama Bin Laden had been able to be made, after his earlier attacks, and the man and his Taliban brought to justice in a more timely fashion, the Twin Towers would still be soaring to the heavens, and thousands of grieving survivors would be doing life normally. If escape concepts for the planes and skyscrapers, "on the drawing board" fifty years ago, had been developed, perfected and put into use, once again, this latest terrorist crisis would, at least, have been less costly in lives lost. The Third Millennium is full of miracles of the best kind, but it is also guaranteed to bring its share of horrors. It is not likely that terrorism will be eliminated completely; we must have our freedom to experience acceptable quality of life. But there is no reason for it to cost lives to the extent that we have so horribly experienced. Even the basic civil defense-type preparedness reduced the casualties at the Pentagon attack site from an early estimate of 800 to around one hundred-a significant number, and one that should encourage preparedness in all of us. The airport next to the building, with planes parked within view of Pentagon staff, motivated a workshop of a sort... "What if one of those planes slipped and crashed into the building?" The logic of any eight-year-old mind resulted in a plan of escape from the Pentagon building,achieved just a few weeks before the attack: which routes to take, basic fire safety response review, and a buddy system for helping others in the office. These few actions saved SEVEN HUNDRED LIVES! And yet such simple work is still carried out by too few , and the concept of developing technology for fast, reliable escape/evacuation from planes and skyscrapers, though fairly simple, in our tech-genius world, has been ignored entirely. At nineleven, a few home handyman ideas received publicity, and sneers. One "left-handed blessing" of this cry for deliverance from such endangerment has resulted in much-improved Preparedness in other areas, thanks to the Department of Homeland Security's invention, and the efforts of public and private groups and individuals, but much of these wonderful new ideas would not have saved the occupants of WTC in a similar scenario. For my late Father, and my late husband, both with science achievements, and into their work, others of their groups, I feel duty-bound on this subject: In the fifties, my Father showed us a Popular Mechanics magazine with art showing the passenger compartment of an airplane sliding away from a burning airplane, like a train car with a parachute, taking the passengers safely to ground ....nearly fifty years ago! "Wha'hoppen? ", he would be saying if he could......why have there been no followups on such ideas? Similarly, not visible externally, but like elevator cars on each floor, escape pods, operating with mechanics independent of the power systems in a skyscraper, could easily eject/evacuate a building's occupants in a few moments, providing a bailout, at every floor level, and elevators and stairwells ,"killer chimneys"in such a scenario, would not need to be used. Primitive graphics of the idea described here will be passed to any who might implement it, but only on request. I had to grow up and stay in my focus like everyone else. Why did not the architects, builders, owners, or occupants of the Towers insist on a simple escape technology? In every other area of life, safety escapes are required. In the eye-opening aftermath of this tragedy, such concepts are so difficult to deal with! We are genius, all-powerful, modern Americans! We don't do dumb stuff! It is not possible that we could have been so negligent, but we were! And now our hope of salvation/redemption, from our sins of omission lies in reconstruction that insures such horror will never happen again! No matter what government can do about terrorism, no matter what architects can do to help skyscapers withstand attack and collapse, no matter how careful we are against human error, planes will crash, buildings may collapse, but with the attention given to effective escape pods, there will not be the horrific loss of life! Not one of us gets reprieved from this burden until we can say: GROUND ZERO-type casualties - NEVER AGAIN! At nine-eleven 2001, my escape pod memory would not leave me alone, so I passed this note around online, with a casual graphic sketch to help the reader understand my description. I sent it to anyone I could find, and showed it to friends and family...e-mailed it to those relevant in techworld and government, and received two impressive replies! Friends who had worked with the scientists mentioned above at United Technologies...librarians, encouraged me to take it to UT. OSHA also liked my letter and sent me links for proceeding. United Technologies offices reception desk was one I had passed many times in visits to the Connecticut Commission on the Arts offices and gallery next door. But when I approached the front desk receptionist, I suddenly felt like a wildwoman on a binge of some sort, became embarassed and said "Good Day". Regrouping, getting moral support and will try again. I will probably also send this to the wonderful Architect Libeskind, mentioned above. Whether I achieve or not, "I'll leave this old world with a satisfied mind" on the subject, as the song proclaimed. Update, February 2004: I have written everyone remotely attached to the project about the jetpack, elevatorcar-like escape pods...and will continue to do so as comfortably fits into my tasking. Although OSHA and United Technology people were kind, respectful, even excited, and referred me, I cannot followup on their leads. Because I would need a grant to make it a halftime job to followup effectively, without self-destructing. My own work demands my priority. A discovery: The site for the group of Nineleven Survivors ( link below ). Activated to insure that the WTC reconstruction includes safety mechanisms omitted in the towers. However, the group is new and so far, have gotten "a promise to install fire extinguishers"....not cool, but interaction. I think its their grieving......I went through a bad one like that long ago....it is very depleting, and so I question not the motive, but the wisdom of leaving the work governing safety tech decisions for WTC restoration in their hands. It takes time for a group to get going effectively, and they seem pointed in the right direction...But the correct safety considerations probably need to be achieved before long....will they "get there" in time? Once construction begins, it may be too late.
~~~~~~~
Relevant Links The Lower Manhattan Redevelopment Corporationoffers data on the heart of the project and links in all directions. Daniel Liebeskind.comhis page...the Berlin-centered architect whose design tops this page. The Skyscraper Safety CampaignSurvivors of Nineleven organized to "do better". If you can help them, please do so. There are other groups involved, many of them very expressive in their desire to find truth in the Nineleven Hearings and implement things that will prevent any such horror from repeating itself. This month, I found stories of these groups chasing, physically, after government representatives who found it necessary to hide behind a door from them. I think they are simply fearful that the matter will not find solution, if the opportunities for it all, "right now" , are denied. Are they right? I love aeronautics, and am a loyal fan of it all since childhood...father and brother both with service and postwar work and interests in the skies...but I do not sympathize with the industry, which has been getting a lot of exposée coverage. Hopefully, freedom of the press will win improvements all around. I welcome respectful comment and questions, and am always careful to reject or report those whose intent to contact is violent and nettiquette absent. If an issue is important, good manners are essential, or the issue self-destructs in the mélée. ....elle |
